Protel Pcb Designing Software here. A Note on the Percent of Accuracy of the New Testament Text by Norman L. Geisler Some have challenged the accuracy of the New Testament (NT) manuscripts based on a statement in our book A General Introduction to the Bible that inadvertently attributed to Bruce Metzer the figure that the NT is copied with 99.5 percent accuracy.

Torrent Softimage Xsi For Mac there. Photoelf Printing Software here. However, this is an inconsequential criticism for several reasons. First, NT textual authorities Westcott and Hort estimated that only about one-sixtieth rise above “trivialities” and can be called “substantial variations.” In short, the NT is 98.33 percent pure.

A General Introduction to the Bible. It satisfies the exacting demands placed on any good Bible introduction. Nix is co-author with Dr. A General Introduction to the Bible has 88 ratings and 7 reviews. Jason said: I'm posting the last of my 2017 reads here this month without reviews, so t. If you are searching for the book A General Introduction to the Bible by Norman L. Geisler in pdf format, then you've come to the right site. We furnish utter edition of. A General Introduction to the Bible, Revised and Expanded by Norman Geisler and William Nix. Noted authors Dr. Norman Geisler and Dr. William Nix have updated.

Second, Greek expert Ezra Abbott said about 19/20 (95 percent) of the readings are “various” rather than “rival” readings, and about 19/20 (95 percent) of the rest make no appreciable difference in the sense of the passage. Thus the text is 99.75 percent accurate. Third, noted NT Greek scholar A. Robertson said the real concern is with about a “thousandth part of the entire text.” So, the reconstructed text of the New Testament is 99.9% free from real concern. Philip Schaff estimated that of the thousands of variations in all the manuscripts known in his day, only 50 were of real significance and of these not one affected “an article of faith.” Even agnostic NT critic Bart Ehrman admits that “ In fact, most of the changes found in early Christian manuscripts have nothing to do with theology or ideology. Far and away the most changes are the result of mistakes pure and simple-slips of the pen, accidental omissions, inadvertent additions, misspelled words, blunders of one sort of another” (Misquoting Jesus, 55). Famous British manuscript expert Sir Frederick Kenyon summed up the matter well when he declared that: “The interval between the dates of original composition and the earliest extant evidence becomes so small as to be in fact negligible, and the last foundation for any doubt that the Scriptures have come down substantially as they were written has now been removed.